跳到正文
AI NEWS JOURNAL
arXiv cs.AIAI NEWS / JOURNAL

PPO 与 SAC:双臂空间机器人协同运动控制的比较研究

arXiv:2610.32034v1 发布类型:新 摘要:随着轨道碎片数量的不断增加,人们对主动清除碎片和在轨服务的兴趣日益浓厚。与单臂系统相比,双臂空间机械手能够在抓取稳定性和载荷分布方面提供更优的性能。然而,在存在臂间碰撞规避、姿态对齐以及传感不确定性的情况下,协调两台机械手仍面临诸多挑战。本文针对具有臂间碰撞规避约束的目标到达任务,提出了一种用于双臂空间机械手协同运动规划的协调强化学习框架。该框架采用一种集中式状态表示,融合了关节空间、末端执行器以及目标相对位置等信息;同时,设计了一种多目标奖励函数,以促进目标达

对应语言译文排队中,完成后自动更新。

Abstract:The growing population of orbital debris has intensified interest in active debris removal and on-orbit servicing, for which dual-arm space manipulators offer improved grasping stability and load distribution relative to single-arm systems. However, coordinating two manipulators under inter-arm collision avoidance, orientation alignment, and sensing uncertainty remains challenging. This paper develops a coordinated reinforcement learning framework for cooperative motion planning of a dual-arm space manipulator in a target-reaching task with inter-arm collision-avoidance constraints. A centralized state representation combines joint-space, end-effector, and target-relative information, while a multi-objective reward function promotes target-reaching accuracy, orientation alignment, motion smoothness, synchronized task completion, and collision avoidance. Within this framework, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) are compared as representative on-policy and off-policy algorithms, and the learned policies are further evaluated for generalization to previously unseen target configurations. Across five random seeds, SAC substantially outperforms PPO within the considered fixed-base simulation scenarios: it reaches an 80% success threshold in every seed (median 1.6M environment steps) whereas PPO does not reach it within a 4M-step budget, and it attains a higher mean success rate (78.6% versus 7.4%) with lower position and orientation errors and tighter bimanual synchronization. Both algorithms degrade on unseen boundary targets, but SAC retains most of its performance while PPO's collapses. The results also expose a failure mode of PPO: under the two-phase shaped reward, it tends to converge to a reward-loitering local optimum rather than committing to the precision task. This behavior highlights the sensitivity of on-policy learning to reward shaping.

Submission history

Access Paper:

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

References & Citations

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Bookmark

Institution

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

资料来源

arXiv cs.AI
← 继续阅读全部动态